Thursday, April 1, 2010
Teach Your Children Well...
In every country, district and town we should arrange for education for the children. A city which does not have a school for its children is excommunicated until arrangements for lessons are made. If the citizens of that town don't want to make such arrangements then the city should be destroyed, for the world exists only because of the [merit of the] study of school children.
Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Talmud Torah 2:1
It should not be surprising that the medieval sage Maimonides’ code summarizing Jewish law should have whole section concerning the laws of education – Hilchot Talmud Torah (remembering that Torah means not only specifically the five books of Moses, but also education as a whole). The first chapter tells about the responsibility to teach one’s own children and what to teach them. The second chapter discusses the responsibilities of the community regarding the education of its children. In addition to the requirement of a town to provide education, there are also suggestions about the age to begin learning (around six or seven), the class size (maximum 25 for one teacher, with an aide until 40, and a second teacher after that), and the proper attitude and aptitudes of instructors (not one who is slovenly, or who pays little attention to the students).
Judaism is a religion that is based on learning – as we noted in our last congregational education day, we are known as the people of the book. But, beyond the idea that a certain amount of instruction is needed to preserve Judaism, we further believe that education is needed to preserve Jews. This fact may often be lost in our modern world of supplemental Jewish education – where we focus on educating about Judaism. The origin of Reform Judaism was in the era in which European Jews were once again beginning to be permitted to study at universities. The concept arose of torah im derekh eretz – Torah with the way of the world, or Jewish and secular education.
Now, where does Judaism stand on the education of others – of those outside the Jewish community? On the one hand, the tradition does heavily favor Jewish study, which is neither relevant nor expected of those who are not regularly involved in the Jewish world. On the other hand, we Jews, in general, have seen our situation improve as the education and knowledge of our neighbors improves. The more knowledgeable and literate a society, the less likely there is to be prejudice (with a few glaring exceptions). Also, we were reminded recently at our Passover seders that we were slaves in Egypt, and we know what it is like to be oppressed. Education can be a means to avoid slavery and oppression – by the ability to change one’s circumstances, know one’s rights, or seek redress of wrongs.
On the means of funding public education, there is a large divide in the Jewish community. In much of the Orthodox community, where separate education in day schools outside the public school sphere is emphasized, there is strong support of voucher systems and public funding for private education. On the more integrated liberal side, where Jewish children are more likely to be in public schools, there is more support for public education and funding. Both because of the deep Jewish commitment to learning for one’s children and education in general, it is not surprising to see Jewish parents so active on PTA’s and school boards.
Some questions to ponder: Where does education fit on the Jewish value ladder – in relation to providing food, clothing, and shelter? How much do we believe, as a value, in the potential of education and what is the necessary infrastructure of a society that rewards education? How do we deal with difficult issues like quotas to help those disadvantaged, when we have been restricted by quotas in the past? What is the personal vs. the communal responsibility for secular or Jewish education?
Rabbi Joel N. Abraham
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
The Buck Stops Where?
Do not favor the poor or show deference to the rich; judge your kin fairly – Lev. 19:15
[In January, I spoke about what Judaism has to say about politics. Not necessarily that Judaism says that one should belong to a particular American political party or vote in a particular way, but in as much as politics is the expression of our national will, we as Jews should be knowledgeable about and guided by the moral and ethical teachings of our Jewish heritage in making our political decisions. Therefore, I will use this column in this month and going forward to lay out some of the different Jewish texts that relate to political issues of the day. This month, we will examine the issues of political influence and corruption and campaign fundraising reform – Rabbi Abraham]
We seem to accept a certain inexorable logic in American politics. To be elected, one needs to campaign. To campaign, one needs money. To raise money, one needs donors. And, after the election, there is a debt owed to the donors. The recent Supreme Court decision declaring that political donations are an aspect of free speech, and therefore fall under Constitutional protections, is expected to impact that political calculus in ways that will favor larger, corporate donors. The fear is that, since corporations can give more money than individuals, they will have undue influence over legislators and, therefore, over legislation.
Judaism seems to weigh in on the influence of money. In Deuteronomy 16:19, the Torah warns that those in political power should not “take a gift: for a gift blinds the eyes of the wise, and perverts the words of the righteous”. The taking of money, or other types of gifts, can cause even those who are wise to see things differently, despite their best efforts, and distorts testimony, even from expert witnesses. (The word “righteous” in the Biblical legal context, actually means those who are judged by a court to be in the right.) Why does this happen? The Talmud explains in Ketubot 105b: "Why is graft forbidden? Once a judge accepts graft he identifies as one with the briber and no one is capable of seeing a fault in himself." There is a relationship created between the giver and receiver, and the receiver begins to identify his interests with the giver. On the more venal end, if the donor does poorly, there will be no more money to give any one. To give a more generous perspective, a legislator might feel that the commitment of those who gave large amounts to his or her campaign should be reflected in that campaign’s results – that legislator’s term in office.
Recently, Rep. Rangel from New York temporarily stepped down from his powerful position as chair of the Ways and Means committee, because of how the perception of a trip that he took on someone else’s dime reflects on the Democratic party and its other candidates. Amid all the other scandals facing him, New York Governor Paterson is facing accusations regarding his accepting Yankee tickets for his family. As voters, we look on these stories and wonder who and what are the influences on our elected officials. Even if there were no cases in which such gifts actually resulted in changing a vote or a line in a bill, our suspicions lead to broken trust. The very idea that our representatives truly represent those who voted for (or even against) them comes into question.
Judaism expects legal cases to be judged on merit – tzedek, tzedek tirdof – Justice, justice shall you pursue. As it says in the portion that we read on Yom Kippur afternoon, the “holiness code” quoted above in Leviticus, we are told not to be swayed by those who have more money, or by those who have less.
Some questions to ponder –
Do we believe in a standard of judgment? Do we expect our legislators to follow their own consciences or to follow the popular will? Does that expectation change how we pick whom we would vote for? Is “transparency” in donation enough of a counter, or does money still blind the eyes of the wise, even if everyone can see where the money is?
Friday, January 1, 2010
Judaism and Politics
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Wonder of Wonders, Miracle of Miracles...
Chanukah sameach